A Call for Consistency: A Reflection on the Macklemore Controversy

A really startling thing has been happening around me in the past couple of weeks.

Perhaps it has always been going on, but being in Cortina, for a second year, constantly surrounded by hopeful discussion and work towards human dignity for all, has really illuminated this issue for me.

Perhaps it is because I hate the hypocrisy within myself so much that hypocrisy becomes for me the most heinous kind of action to observe in the world around me.

I’m sure someone will read this as SUPER preachy, obnoxious, and prying, and you should know that I’m totally open for discussion. Please come talk to me about this if it strikes any sort of chord with your soul, whether a pleasant one or not.

But I am going to say this now, because this issue has really become frustrating and confusing for me, and I want to say something about it to all of you, and maybe someone who agrees with me and wants to preach to the choir will read it, and I will make a new friend. On the other hand, maybe someone who totally disagrees with me will have the respect and courage for me to talk to me about it, and I will see something new from the opposite side that I never saw before. Or maybe I won’t, and we will agree to disagree. Hopefully we would be able to respect each other as people, outside of what we think of each others’ ideologies.

That last paragraph I wrote is coming from the best possible version of myself. I regularly become annoyed with people who do not see the world the same way I do, and only in my wildest dreams could I perfectly live up to the ideal I set for myself there.  AHHH!!! This illustrates so perfectly the very thing that I needed to verbalize, and please know that it means I trust and respect all of you A LOT to be actually submitting this to the blog.

HERE’S THE ACTUAL POINT OF THIS BLOG POST:

(nervous Brooke)
The reactions to the Creightonian editorial letter from the Macklemore protestors, and a ton of Facebook comments that random ultra-conservative blog posts get when my friends post them to Facebook, just look like a complete lack of coherence in claims for tolerance and actual treatment of those different than us.

If we claim that we are fighting for the equality and dignity of all people, how does that give us any right to treat those who seem to oppose us in our “fight” as any less than whole people?

When racist, sexist, homophobic opinions are found by those around me, either on the Internet or elsewhere, they are thrown down with such fervor that the line between the opinion and the person who holds it is lost.

I wholeheartedly disagree with the Macklemore letter-writers’ opinion on gay marriage, and I want to make that clear, because any vagueness on my part would make you question my motives for writing this. But when a very diplomatic and well-written letter calling into question Creighton’s support of an artist on moral grounds was published by the Creightonian, some of the people that I love and respect, and most of the time agree with, responded in mean, spiteful, and personally insulting ways. Of equal importance, in my opinion, was the way that those students’ right to write about and publish their opinion was dangerously questioned and slammed down. Whenever a change is being implemented in society, there are going to be a wide range of opinions about it. Some may be blatantly wrong. Personally, again, I disagree with what they were asking Creighton for and why they were asking it, and I know that some super hypocritical stuff  was found on that guy’s Twitter. But I’m not here to talk about that.

This is not an isolated event. Sometimes, when we live in the bubble of a Midwestern, justice-focused, liberal arts university, we forget just how much of the world of ideas lives outside this bubble. It’s been increasingly common for people I love (on BOTH sides of the polarized political spectrum), as well as generally fantastic websites like Upworthy, to use the Internet to post an article, blog, or piece of art made by someone of a very different worldview than their own, and then absolutely vilify that person for stating their opinion. Obviously, many of the people who comment on it are also shocked at the “backwardness” or racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. of the original writer. While I do think it is totally appropriate and necessary to discuss and even debate controversial and emotionally-charged topics that are often the focus of these articles, we cannot claim to be in support of human dignity and equal treatment when we dehumanize the people behind the opinions. It’s a matter of consistency, as well as just common decency (something that is increasingly lost in our social-media-crazed, politically polarized world).

People! We seriously don’t have to be a part of this craziness! We can be different. We can start something within our community where we don’t just have respectful discussions within our community, but have actually well-thought-out and respectful answers to opinions we don’t agree with. Diplomatic and sincerely kind but educated and strong. Isn’t that who we want to be in the end? There’s a balance there, and it hangs delicately. That’s certainly who I am hoping and trying to become. Because a world full of people like that is a world that’s actually going to move in a positive direction.

-Brooke F.

5 thoughts on “A Call for Consistency: A Reflection on the Macklemore Controversy

  1. I thank you for being honest enough to both voice your opinion (which I personally disagree with), but actually managing to partake a respectful and thoughtful stance on the issue. Whatever your stance, I think that we can observe two different problems in the circulation of the article: the students who sent the letter came across as angry and divisive, where they were trying to hold up their views of what is right, and that the opposition was crude, irrational and hateful in response. I personally think that what many people miss concerning this issue is that BOTH sides are actually trying to promote the good of homosexual people, we just disagree as to what that good actually is. As a faithful Catholic, I see the uniting of two people in the martial bond as the device instituted to further human participation in the creative act: the most powerful ability we are endowed with as a person. As such, a homosexual person cannot participate in that final end toward which marriage always needs strive, not because of a defect of their capacity to love, but because of the physical nature that they have been created with. As a compassionate person, I desire for every person the opportunity to embrace another in the unitive bond that we so desperately desire to have. However, I also must recognize that I (the Church) am not asking anymore of these people that I am asking of any other person, heterosexual or homosexual: chastity. While I feel that I am in the minority in believing this, I think we should all meditate upon the words of Pope Francis, as many have used these words to further a personal agenda on either side. “If someone is gay and he searches for the Lord and has good will, who am I to judge?” This is an example we should all do well to follow: note the “searches for the Lord” in that statement. That is not to say that we are to condemn all those we see as doing wrong, but to see their failures as we see our own, reject our sinfulness, and ultimately share in the love of God and share this love with our neighbors (yes, even the homosexual ones).

    Like

  2. Great post. I have to make a conscious effort to remember to respect the opinions of those I disagree with…I’m not always successful, but I try. I’ve always wished that others would attempt to do the same. You should send this in to the Creightonian…everyone who read the originally published article should read this.

    Like

  3. Brooke, thank you for your honesty. Coming from the other side of your opinion I can’t say that I agree with you and I could post a long citation of X, Y, and Z to back that up… BUT that is not as interesting or stimulating! So if you, or anyone else who wants to talk about these issues (or any other issue) I would love to grab lunch or dinner sometime. My number is 402-318-4568. Thank you.

    Like

  4. Brooke, you raise a great point about how disproportionately negative and hateful so much of the general response to the open letter has been. I have spoken with the author of the letter and his experiences of remarkable hatred from fellow Creighton students since then is nauseating. The original letter kindly and humbly informed our Creighton leaders that an artist they were financially supporting is actively and publicly working toward an anti-Catholic stance. The response has been anything but kind and humble. In fact, the letter never even encourages changing anyone’s opinion or stance on the issue. It does NOT say, “people with same-sex attraction are horrible and God hates them!” or even that they need to be converted from their beliefs. Rather it simply asks Creighton to uphold its Catholic identity by not financially supporting Macklemore. It’s unfathomable how much hatred that simple and humble request has received in response.

    I agree with Matt H. (above) that the Catholic Church has a beautiful and deep reasoning for its stance on same-sex attraction. I sincerely encourage you to explore those truths and see what you think, rather than simply listening to those who sneer at it. Matt H. is right on the money with pointing out that the Catholic Church calls people with same-sex attraction to the same level of purity and chastity that it calls me as an unmarried man.

    As one challenge question: how would you suspect this situation would have progressed had it been the other way around? For instance, if a speaker were coming to campus to explain the Catholic Church’s stance against same-sex marriage and a group of students sent a respectful letter to the university asking that it not be funded, would anyone have treated them with such hatred? Would local news have been involved? Would those liberal letter-writers face any scorn, dirty looks, hateful emails, or even avoidance around campus? I would suspect that they would not.

    Thank you for helping call out some of the truly gut-wrenching and hateful language that we see thrown around our campus lately.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s